Home › About › Why two organisations?

Complementarity

Why an institute and a think tank?

Because selling expertise and leading public debate are both legitimate callings, but they cannot follow the same rules. Keeping them separate protects each of them.

At a glance

Two distinct models

Institut de Stratégies AbidjanStrategic Reflection Circle “Abidjan”
NatureConsultancy: research, advisory and trainingNon-profit think tank
Business modelPaid servicesVolunteering and partnerships, no commercial activity
AudiencesCompanies, institutions, managers in trainingGeneral public, students, civil society, decision-makers
ActivitiesCertified programmes, capacity building, studies and surveysFree University of Geopolitics, Business24, open-access publications
AccessPaid registration or quoteFree, on registration

What each brings to the other

A deliberate complementarity

The Circle’s panels surface questions, controversies and weak signals that the Institute builds into its programmes and analyses.

The methodological rigour developed at the Institute guarantees the Circle’s audience discussions grounded in facts and proven analytical frameworks.

Funds from the Circle’s partners do not finance the Institute’s commercial activity, and vice versa. Each organisation keeps its own accounts.

I am a donor: how can I be sure my support stays with the think tank?

Partnership agreements are signed with the Circle, which has its own governance and publishes its funding sources. See Partners & funding.

Does attending a free panel commit me to the Institute?

No. Registering for a panel does not sign you up to any commercial offer. You can choose separately to receive information from the Institute.

Who runs the two organisations?

Dr Sylvain N’Guessan founded both organisations. Their decision-making bodies and budgets remain separate. See the Circle’s governance.